Skip to content
Official alerts and notifications portal
Menu
RASFFReference 2026.3968

Anisakidae spp. larvae detected in mackerel (Scomber scombrus) from Norway.

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

Open official publication ↗

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2026.3968
Notification ID
841949
Classification
information notification for follow-up
Risk decision
not serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
official control on the market
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
mackerel (Scomber scombrus)
Distribution status
Description
no distribution from notifying country
Notification ID
222
Notification ID
30620662
Category
Description
fish and fish products
Notification ID
18445
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    30620709
    temperature
    Description
    frozen
    Notification ID
    27369

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
134738

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    In 3 fish, 18–23 Anisakis sp. were detected on the serosal membranes.
    Hazard category
    Description
    parasitic infestation
    Notification ID
    30620750
    Name
    Anisakis simplex - parasitic infestation with - parasitic infestation
    samplingDate
    29-04-2026 00:00:00
  2. analyticalResult
    In 3 fish, 4–72 Anisakis sp. were detected on the serosal membranes.
    Hazard category
    Description
    parasitic infestation
    Notification ID
    30620724
    Name
    Anisakis simplex - parasitic infestation with - parasitic infestation
    samplingDate
    29-04-2026 00:00:00

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    withdrawal from the market
    Notification ID
    18837
    Notification ID
    30620916
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5024
    isoCode
    LV
    organizationName
    Latvia
  2. Action taken
    Description
    informing consignor
    Notification ID
    18826
    Notification ID
    30664718
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5027
    isoCode
    NO
    organizationName
    Norway

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Norway
Notifying country or territory
Latvia
Published distribution
Latvia, Norway
Affected territories
Latvia · Norway

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      841949
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      841949
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      841949
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      841949
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      841949
    Organisation
    code
    LV
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5024
    Description
    Latvia
    Notification ID
    24
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      841949
    Organisation
    code
    LT
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5022
    Description
    Lithuania
    Notification ID
    61
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      841949
    2. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      841949
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      841949
    4. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      841949
    Organisation
    code
    NO
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5027
    Description
    Norway
    Notification ID
    4

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    06-05-2026 14:01:49
    fupId
    842272
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    corrigendum
    Notification ID
    27663
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission
  2. fupDate
    19-05-2026 12:49:22
    fupId
    845225
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations
    Notification ID
    27674
    networkOrganizationId
    4
    organizationCode
    NO
    organizationDescription
    Norway

RASFF

5027
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5027
    Notification ID
    31

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.