Skip to content
RASFFReference 2026.1518

Non dioxin-like PCBs in Palm Acid Oil

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2026.1518
Notification ID
824231
Classification
information notification for follow-up
Risk decision
potential risk
Product type
feed
Notification basis
company's own check
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Palm Acid Oil
Distribution status
Description
distribution to non-member countries only
Notification ID
225
Notification ID
30386966
Category
Description
feed materials
Notification ID
18443
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    30388149

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

hazardObserved
Non dioxin-like PCBs
Notification ID
130938

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    36,9 and 42,5
    Hazard category
    Description
    chemical contamination (other)
    Notification ID
    30388162
    maxPermittedLvl
    10 µg/kg - ppb
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    10
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    µg/kg - ppb
    Name
    ndl-PCB - chemical contamination (other)
    samplingDate
    22-10-2025 00:00:00
    unit
    µg/kg - ppb
  2. analyticalResult
    594
    Hazard category
    Description
    chemical contamination (other)
    Notification ID
    30388211
    maxPermittedLvl
    10 µg/kg - ppb
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    10
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    µg/kg - ppb
    Name
    ndl-PCB - chemical contamination (other)
    samplingDate
    22-10-2025 00:00:00
    unit
    µg/kg - ppb

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    informing recipient(s)
    Notification ID
    18383
    Notification ID
    30388379
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5031
    isoCode
    SE
    organizationName
    Sweden
  2. Action taken
    Description
    return to consignor
    Notification ID
    18835
    Notification ID
    30412492
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5027
    isoCode
    NO
    organizationName
    Norway

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Singapore
Notifying country or territory
Sweden
Published distribution
Norway
Affected territories
Norway

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      824231
    2. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      824231
    Organisation
    code
    NO
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5027
    Description
    Norway
    Notification ID
    4
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      825806
    2. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      825806
    Organisation
    code
    SG
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5203
    Description
    Singapore
    Notification ID
    10198
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      824231
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      826386
    3. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      826386
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      824231
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      824231
    Organisation
    code
    SE
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5031
    Description
    Sweden
    Notification ID
    62

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    24-02-2026 10:56:00
    fupId
    825806
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    corrigendum
    Notification ID
    27663
    networkOrganizationId
    14101
    organizationCode
    SE
    organizationDescription
    Swedish Board of Agriculture
  2. fupDate
    25-02-2026 13:35:16
    fupId
    826386
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations and measures taken
    Notification ID
    27659
    networkOrganizationId
    4
    organizationCode
    NO
    organizationDescription
    Norway

RASFF

5027
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5027
    Notification ID
    31
5031
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5031
    Notification ID
    37
    link
    http://www.livsmedelsverket.se/om-oss/press/aterkallanden/

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.