Skip to content
RASFFReference 2026.5806

Pesticide residues in Thai basil from Thailand, via the Czech Republic

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2026.5806
Notification ID
854894
Classification
information notification for attention
Risk decision
serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
official control on the market
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Thai basil
Distribution status
Description
product (presumably) no longer on the market
Notification ID
223
Notification ID
30792304
Category
Description
herbs and spices
Notification ID
18450
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    30792315
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368
    weight
    100.0
    weightUnit
    Description
    g
    Notification ID
    18974

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
137692

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    0,54 ± 0,27
    Hazard category
    Description
    pesticide residues
    Notification ID
    30792331
    maxPermittedLvl
    0,02 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    0,02
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    propiconazole - pesticide residues
    samplingDate
    26-05-2026 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm
  2. analyticalResult
    0,050 ± 0,025
    Hazard category
    Description
    pesticide residues
    Notification ID
    30792347
    maxPermittedLvl
    0,02 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    0,02
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    valifenalate - pesticide residues
    samplingDate
    26-05-2026 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    no stock left
    Notification ID
    18843
    Notification ID
    30792533
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5007
    isoCode
    DE
    organizationName
    Germany

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Thailand
Notifying country or territory
Germany
Published distribution
Czechia, Germany
Affected territories
Czechia · Germany

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      863822
    2. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      863822
    Organisation
    code
    CZ
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5006
    Description
    Czechia
    Notification ID
    37
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      854894
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      854894
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      854894
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      854894
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      854894
    Organisation
    code
    DE
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5007
    Description
    Germany
    Notification ID
    3
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      854894
    2. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      863822
    Organisation
    code
    TH
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5216
    Description
    Thailand
    Notification ID
    10211

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. additionalInfoId
    30909902
    fupDate
    04-08-2026 11:11:11
    fupId
    863822
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations
    Notification ID
    27674
    networkOrganizationId
    37
    organizationCode
    CZ
    organizationDescription
    Czechia

RASFF

Additional information

  1. contactPerson
    E-Mail: schnellwarnsystem@bvl.bund.de
    Notification ID
    30792305
    Organisation
    Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Gerichtstraße 49, 13347 Berlin
  2. contactPerson
    rasff@szpi.gov.cz
    Notification ID
    30909902
    Organisation
    Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority

RASFF

5006
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5006
    Notification ID
    9
5007
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5007
    Notification ID
    16
    link
    http://www.lebensmittelwarnung.de

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.