Skip to content
Official alerts and notifications portal
Menu
RASFFReference 2025.4412

Exceed trans fatty acids 12,9 ± 1,2 g/100 g in candies from waffle with chocolate glaze from Russia

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

Open official publication ↗

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2025.4412
Notification ID
768152
Classification
information notification for follow-up
Risk decision
not serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
border control - consignment released
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Candies from waffle with chocolate glaze V strane Liliputov
Distribution status
Description
distribution to other member countries
Notification ID
219
Notification ID
28794875
Category
Description
confectionery
Notification ID
18437
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    28794984
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

hazardObserved
Exceed trans fatty acids 12,9 ± 1,2 g/100 g in candies from waffle with chocolate glaze from Russia
Notification ID
119609

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    12,9 ± 1,2 g/100 g
    Hazard category
    Description
    composition
    Notification ID
    28795079
    maxPermittedLvl
    2 g/100g fat
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    2
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    g/100g fat
    Name
    trans fatty acids - too high content - composition
    samplingDate
    26-05-2025 00:00:00
    unit
    g/100g fat

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    informing authorities
    Notification ID
    18380
    Notification ID
    28795037
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5024
    isoCode
    LV
    organizationName
    Latvia
  2. Action taken
    Description
    Destruction
    Notification ID
    18700
    Notification ID
    28867012
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5024
    isoCode
    LV
    organizationName
    Latvia

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Russia
Notifying country or territory
Latvia
Published distribution
Estonia, Latvia
Affected territories
Estonia · Latvia

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      768152
    2. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      768152
    3. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      768152
    Organisation
    code
    EE
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5009
    Description
    Estonia
    Notification ID
    58
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      768152
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      773233
    3. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      773233
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      768152
    5. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      768152
    6. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      768152
    7. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      768152
    Organisation
    code
    LV
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5024
    Description
    Latvia
    Notification ID
    24
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      768152
    2. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      768152
    Organisation
    code
    RU
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5186
    Description
    Russia
    Notification ID
    10181

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    12-06-2025 13:52:48
    fupId
    769711
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    corrigendum
    Notification ID
    27663
    networkOrganizationId
    24
    organizationCode
    LV
    organizationDescription
    Latvia
  2. fupDate
    27-06-2025 15:17:00
    fupId
    773233
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations and measures taken
    Notification ID
    27659
    networkOrganizationId
    58
    organizationCode
    EE
    organizationDescription
    Estonia

RASFF

5009
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5009
    Notification ID
    11

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.