Skip to content
RASFFReference 2024.2654

Depasire LMA acizi grasi trans in produsul Tort Vafe Fulgulet, origine Ucraina/////Exceeding the MLA for trans fatty acids in the product wafer -glazed sweets, origin Ukraine

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2024.2654
Notification ID
674951
Classification
information notification for attention
Risk decision
potential risk
Product type
food
Notification basis
surveillance programme / monitoring sample
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Tort Vafe Fulgulet//Fulgulet waffle cake
Distribution status
Description
distribution restricted to notifying country
Notification ID
220
Notification ID
24008748
Category
Description
confectionery
Notification ID
18437
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    24009054
    productAspect
    Cutii//Cardboard box
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368
    weight
    1.1
    weightUnit
    Description
    kg
    Notification ID
    18973

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

hazardObserved
Depasire LMA acizi grasi trans in produsul Tort Vafe Fulgulet, origine Ucraina/////Exceeding the MLA for trans fatty acids in the product wafer -glazed sweets origin Ukrain
Notification ID
100469

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    4,178
    Hazard category
    Description
    composition
    Notification ID
    24009343
    maxPermittedLvl
    2 g/100g
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    2
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    g/100g
    Name
    trans fatty acids - too high content - composition
    samplingDate
    21-03-2024 00:00:00
    unit
    g/100g

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    withdrawal from the market
    Notification ID
    18837
    Notification ID
    24009635
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5030
    isoCode
    RO
    organizationName
    Romania

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Ukraine
Notifying country or territory
Romania
Published distribution
Romania
Affected territories
Romania

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      674951
    Organisation
    code
    INFO
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5680
    Description
    INFOSAN
    Notification ID
    10340
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      674951
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      674951
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      674951
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      674951
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      674951
    Organisation
    code
    RO
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5030
    Description
    Romania
    Notification ID
    42
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      686459
    2. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      674951
    3. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      674951
    Organisation
    code
    UA
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5228
    Description
    Ukraine
    Notification ID
    10223

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    04-04-2024 16:33:58
    fupId
    675771
    fupNumber
    1
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission
  2. fupDate
    26-04-2024 09:37:04
    fupId
    681302
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations and measures taken
    Notification ID
    27659
    networkOrganizationId
    183
    organizationCode
    RO
    organizationDescription
    Cluj
  3. fupDate
    22-05-2024 15:26:26
    fupId
    686459
    fupNumber
    3
    fupType
    Description
    follow-up from non-member country
    Notification ID
    27671
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission

RASFF

5030
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5030
    Notification ID
    33

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.