Skip to content
RASFFReference 2024.4529

Exceeded sucralose content in an Energy drink from the USA

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2024.4529
Notification ID
690721
Classification
information notification for follow-up
Risk decision
potential risk
Product type
food
Notification basis
official control on the market
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Energy drink
Distribution status
Description
product traded online
Notification ID
228
Notification ID
24703331
Category
Description
non-alcoholic beverages
Notification ID
18426
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    24703593
    productAspect
    Products are packed in aluminum cans
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368
    weight
    473.0
    weightUnit
    Description
    ml
    Notification ID
    18971

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

hazardObserved
Sample according to the measured content for the sweetener sucralose – E 955 (the measured content amounts to470 ± 94 mg/L), represents an acceptable risk to the health of consumers, if we take into account the usual and realistically predictable way of consuming such drinks, and the existing toxicological data sucralose. For children, it has been considered that they do not consume such energy drinks, which is consistent with the information on the packaging.
Notification ID
103933

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    470
    Hazard category
    Description
    food additives and flavourings
    Notification ID
    24705833
    maxPermittedLvl
    300 mg/l
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    300
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/l
    Name
    sweetener E 955 - sucralose - unauthorised - food additives and flavourings
    samplingDate
    05-04-2024 00:00:00

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    (requested) removal of online offer
    Notification ID
    18850
    Notification ID
    24710970
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5032
    isoCode
    SI
    organizationName
    Slovenia

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
United States
Notifying country or territory
Slovenia
Published distribution
Slovenia
Affected territories
Slovenia

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      690721
    2. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      690721
    Organisation
    code
    NL
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5026
    Description
    Netherlands
    Notification ID
    38
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      690721
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      690721
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      690721
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      690721
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      690721
    Organisation
    code
    SI
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5032
    Description
    Slovenia
    Notification ID
    59
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      702117
    2. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      690721
    3. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      702117
    4. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      690721
    Organisation
    code
    US
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5230
    Description
    United States
    Notification ID
    10225

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    12-06-2024 15:59:31
    fupId
    691143
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    corrigendum
    Notification ID
    27663
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission
  2. fupDate
    30-07-2024 16:09:25
    fupId
    702117
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    request
    Notification ID
    27665
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission

RASFF

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.