Skip to content
Official alerts and notifications portal
Menu
RASFFReference 2023.3229

detection of too high content of hydrocyanic acid on organic golden flax seeds

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

Open official publication ↗

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2023.3229
Notification ID
611366
Classification
alert notification
Risk decision
serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
company's own check
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
organic golden flax seeds
Distribution status
Description
distribution to other member countries
Notification ID
219
Notification ID
20052666
Category
Description
nuts, nut products and seeds
Notification ID
18427
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    20052973
    productAspect
    250 g transparent plastic bag
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
84738

RASFF

Hazards

  1. Hazard category
    Description
    biological contaminants
    Notification ID
    20053017
    Name
    cyanide - too high content - biological contaminants
    samplingDate
    17-03-2023 00:00:00

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    withdrawal from the market
    Notification ID
    18837
    Notification ID
    20053222
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5013
    isoCode
    FR
    organizationName
    France
  2. Action taken
    Description
    recall from consumer
    Notification ID
    18836
    Notification ID
    20053223
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5013
    isoCode
    FR
    organizationName
    France
  3. Action taken
    Description
    public warning - press release
    Notification ID
    18838
    Notification ID
    20065409
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5023
    isoCode
    LU
    organizationName
    Luxembourg

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
France
Notifying country or territory
France
Published distribution
Belgium, Luxembourg
Affected territories
Belgium · Luxembourg

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      611366
    2. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      611366
    Organisation
    code
    BE
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Description
    Belgium
    Notification ID
    7
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      611366
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      611366
    3. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      611366
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      611366
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      611366
    Organisation
    code
    FR
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5013
    Description
    France
    Notification ID
    14
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      611366
    2. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      611366
    Organisation
    code
    LU
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Description
    Luxembourg
    Notification ID
    18

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    16-05-2023 12:03:15
    fupId
    611557
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    measures taken
    Notification ID
    27672
    networkOrganizationId
    18
    organizationCode
    LU
    organizationDescription
    Luxembourg

RASFF

5002
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Notification ID
    2
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Notification ID
    3
5013
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5013
    Notification ID
    14
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5013
    Notification ID
    15
    link
    http://www.economie.gouv.fr/dgccrf/Securite/Alertes/Avis-rappels-de-produits
5023
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Notification ID
    26
    link
    http://www.securite-alimentaire.public.lu/
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Notification ID
    27
    link
    lu-alert.lu

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.