Skip to content
Official alerts and notifications portal
Menu
RASFFReference 2023.8780

Exceedance of pesticides residues in tea imported from USA

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

Open official publication ↗

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2023.8780
Notification ID
651997
Classification
information notification for attention
Risk decision
not serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
border control - consignment released
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Black tea (fermented) and partly fermented tea, in immediate packings of a content not exceeding 3|kg
Distribution status
Description
no distribution from notifying country
Notification ID
222
Notification ID
22665701
Category
Description
cocoa and cocoa preparations, coffee and tea
Notification ID
18435
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    22665703
    labelling
    Best By: OCT/09/2025 Lot 23282
    productAspect
    bag with 50 teabags
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
95352

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    0.041
    Hazard category
    Description
    pesticide residues
    Notification ID
    22687175
    maxPermittedLvl
    0.02 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    0.02
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    anthraquinone - pesticide residues
    samplingDate
    07-12-2023 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm
  2. analyticalResult
    0.40
    Hazard category
    Description
    pesticide residues
    Notification ID
    22687187
    maxPermittedLvl
    0.05 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    0.05
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    pyrimethanil - pesticide residues
    samplingDate
    07-12-2023 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    withdrawal from the market
    Notification ID
    18837
    Notification ID
    22665705
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5023
    isoCode
    LU
    organizationName
    Luxembourg

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
United States
Notifying country or territory
Luxembourg
Published distribution
Luxembourg
Affected territories
Luxembourg

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      651997
    Organisation
    code
    INFO
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5680
    Description
    INFOSAN
    Notification ID
    10340
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      651997
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      651997
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      651997
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      651997
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      651997
    Organisation
    code
    LU
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Description
    Luxembourg
    Notification ID
    18
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      651997
    2. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      651997
    Organisation
    code
    US
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5230
    Description
    United States
    Notification ID
    10225

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    20-12-2023 09:47:57
    fupId
    652884
    fupNumber
    1
    networkOrganizationId
    18
    organizationCode
    LU
    organizationDescription
    Luxembourg
  2. fupDate
    29-12-2023 17:25:19
    fupId
    654646
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    request
    Notification ID
    27665
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission

RASFF

5023
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Notification ID
    26
    link
    http://www.securite-alimentaire.public.lu/
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Notification ID
    27
    link
    lu-alert.lu

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.