Skip to content
RASFFReference 2023.5013

Fosthiazate in potatoes from Belgium

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2023.5013
Notification ID
625085
Classification
alert notification
Risk decision
serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
company's own check
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Potatoes "Annabelle"
Distribution status
Description
distribution to other member countries
Notification ID
219
Notification ID
21380879
Category
Description
fruits and vegetables
Notification ID
18448
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    21380938
    labelling
    Verp. 102425 – P2890
    productAspect
    15kg of potatoes in green EPS cases
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
88289

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    0,058
    Hazard category
    Description
    pesticide residues
    Notification ID
    21381013
    maxPermittedLvl
    0,02 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    0,02
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    fosthiazate - pesticide residues
    samplingDate
    18-07-2023 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm
  2. analyticalResult
    0,033
    Hazard category
    Description
    pesticide residues
    Notification ID
    21381024
    maxPermittedLvl
    0,02 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    0,02
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    fosthiazate - pesticide residues
    samplingDate
    20-07-2023 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    recall from consumer
    Notification ID
    18836
    Notification ID
    21381277
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5002
    isoCode
    BE
    organizationName
    Belgium
  2. Action taken
    Description
    recall from consumer
    Notification ID
    18836
    Notification ID
    21400730
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5023
    isoCode
    LU
    organizationName
    Luxembourg

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Belgium
Notifying country or territory
Belgium
Published distribution
Luxembourg
Affected territories
Luxembourg

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      625085
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      625085
    3. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      625085
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      625085
    5. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      625085
    Organisation
    code
    BE
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Description
    Belgium
    Notification ID
    7
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      625085
    2. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      625230
    3. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      625085
    Organisation
    code
    LU
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Description
    Luxembourg
    Notification ID
    18

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    26-07-2023 11:08:02
    fupId
    625230
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    accompanying documents
    Notification ID
    27662
    networkOrganizationId
    7
    organizationCode
    BE
    organizationDescription
    Belgium
  2. fupDate
    28-07-2023 09:43:34
    fupId
    625948
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations
    Notification ID
    27674
    networkOrganizationId
    18
    organizationCode
    LU
    organizationDescription
    Luxembourg

RASFF

5002
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Notification ID
    2
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Notification ID
    3
5023
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Notification ID
    26
    link
    http://www.securite-alimentaire.public.lu/
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5023
    Notification ID
    27
    link
    lu-alert.lu

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.