Skip to content
RASFFReference 2021.3737

Too high content of manganese and zinc in feed for poultry from Belgium

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2021.3737
Notification ID
487695
Classification
information notification for follow-up
Risk decision
not serious
Product type
feed
Notification basis
official control on the market
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
Complete feed for poultry
Distribution status
Description
distribution to other member countries
Notification ID
219
Notification ID
6174551
Category
Description
compound feeds
Notification ID
18436
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    6174647
    productAspect
    bags
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368
    weight
    20.0
    weightUnit
    Description
    kg
    Notification ID
    18973

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
50732

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    202
    Hazard category
    Description
    migration
    Notification ID
    6174719
    maxPermittedLvl
    150 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    150
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    manganese - migration - migration
    samplingDate
    20-05-2021 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm
  2. analyticalResult
    161
    Hazard category
    Description
    composition
    Notification ID
    6174749
    maxPermittedLvl
    120 mg/kg - ppm
    maxPermittedLvlQuantities
    120
    maxPermittedLvlUnit
    mg/kg - ppm
    Name
    zinc - too high content - composition
    samplingDate
    20-05-2021 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    withdrawal from the market
    Notification ID
    18837
    Notification ID
    6174648
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5002
    isoCode
    BE
    organizationName
    Belgium

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Belgium
Notifying country or territory
Belgium
Published distribution
Belgium, Netherlands
Affected territories
Belgium · Netherlands

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      487695
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      487695
    3. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      487695
    4. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      487695
    5. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      487695
    6. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      487695
    7. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      487695
    Organisation
    code
    BE
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Description
    Belgium
    Notification ID
    7
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      487695
    2. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      487695
    Organisation
    code
    NL
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5026
    Description
    Netherlands
    Notification ID
    38

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    14-07-2021 11:38:04
    fupId
    487823
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    corrigendum
    Notification ID
    27663
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission
  2. fupDate
    04-01-2022 09:04:03
    fupId
    524729
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations
    Notification ID
    27674
    networkOrganizationId
    38
    organizationCode
    NL
    organizationDescription
    Netherlands
  3. fupDate
    06-01-2022 19:10:55
    fupId
    525373
    fupNumber
    3
    fupType
    Description
    corrigendum
    Notification ID
    27663
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission

RASFF

5002
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Notification ID
    2
  2. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5002
    Notification ID
    3

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.