Skip to content
Official alerts and notifications portal
Menu
RASFFReference 2020.3223

High content of iodine in seaweed from Japan

Official information organised for easier consultation. The source publication remains authoritative.

Open official publication ↗

RASFF

Identification and classification

Reference
2020.3223
Notification ID
437798
Classification
alert notification
Risk decision
serious
Product type
food
Notification basis
border control - consignment released
Status
ec_validated

RASFF

Product

Description
seaweed
Distribution status
Description
distribution to other member countries
Notification ID
219
Notification ID
2495242
Category
Description
fruits and vegetables
Notification ID
18448
Product descriptions
  1. Notification ID
    2495249
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368
    weight
    20.0
    weightUnit
    Description
    kg
    Notification ID
    18973
  2. Notification ID
    2501880
    temperature
    Description
    ambient
    Notification ID
    27368
    weight
    20.0
    weightUnit
    Description
    kg
    Notification ID
    18973

RASFF

Risk and analytical results

Notification ID
39118

RASFF

Hazards

  1. analyticalResult
    3300 (+/- 820)
    Hazard category
    Description
    chemical contamination (other)
    Notification ID
    2495666
    Name
    chemical contamination - risk - chemical contamination (other)
    samplingDate
    27-07-2020 00:00:00
    unit
    mg/kg - ppm

RASFF

Measures

  1. Action taken
    Description
    no action taken
    Notification ID
    18827
    Notification ID
    2495486
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5032
    isoCode
    SI
    organizationName
    Slovenia
  2. Action taken
    Description
    seizure
    Notification ID
    18840
    Notification ID
    2501885
    takenBy
    Notification ID
    5020
    isoCode
    IT
    organizationName
    Italy

RASFF

Origin, notification and distribution

Origin
Japan
Notifying country or territory
Slovenia
Published distribution
Italy
Affected territories
Italy

RASFF

Published territorial roles

  1. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      437798
    Organisation
    code
    INFO
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5680
    Description
    INFOSAN
    Notification ID
    10340
  2. Roles
    1. Role
      FOR_ATTENTION
      notificationId
      437798
    2. Role
      DISTRIBUTION
      notificationId
      437798
    3. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      438082
    4. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      437798
    Organisation
    code
    IT
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5020
    Description
    Italy
    Notification ID
    9
  3. Roles
    1. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      438082
    2. Role
      ORIGIN
      notificationId
      437798
    3. Role
      OPERATOR
      notificationId
      437798
    Organisation
    code
    JP
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5125
    Description
    Japan
    Notification ID
    10120
  4. Roles
    1. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      437798
    2. Role
      NOTIFYING
      notificationId
      437798
    3. Role
      FOR_FOLLOW_UP
      notificationId
      437798
    Organisation
    code
    SI
    countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5032
    Description
    Slovenia
    Notification ID
    59

RASFF

Follow-ups

  1. fupDate
    14-08-2020 11:02:28
    fupId
    438082
    fupNumber
    1
    fupType
    Description
    outcome of investigations and measures taken
    Notification ID
    27659
    networkOrganizationId
    165
    organizationCode
    IT
    organizationDescription
    Veneto
  2. fupDate
    24-08-2020 14:36:17
    fupId
    439126
    fupNumber
    2
    fupType
    Description
    translation
    Notification ID
    27675
    networkOrganizationId
    1
    organizationCode
    EU
    organizationDescription
    European Commission

RASFF

5020
  1. countryNetworkOrganizationId
    5020
    Notification ID
    25

Provenance and context

NagameAlert organises public RASFF data while preserving official values and keeping notification classification separate from the risk decision. The official record remains authoritative and should be checked for follow-ups and current status.